New: the live interview co-pilot
LandMode keeps your applications, finds the next role, shows why you are rejected, and guides you live in the interview.
Free for a whole search: 50 applications and 30 interview minutes a month. No card.
Question · System design
Design a URL shortener like bit.ly
How to answer
Hash IDs into a key-value store
Now · Requirements
0:03 / 5:00Watch out: Don’t draw boxes yet
The co-pilot during a system design round. Sample data.
LandMode runs your search with you, from the first role you find to the last round. Here is what it does at each step.
Before you apply
Describe the move in a sentence. It goes looking, then argues both sides of every company it brings back.
“VP or Director of Engineering at a 100–400 person company in Tel Aviv. I want to stay five years.”
While you apply
Forward any job email and the row files itself. It never reads your inbox, and it notices when a company goes quiet.
Fireblocks · VP Engineering
filed itself 4 minutes ago
Ramp · Staff Engineer
nothing since 19 Aug
When it is not working
Coach reads every job on your board against your resume and names what the rejections had in common, with the count behind it.
7 of 11 closed at “Getting a reply”.
Put evidence for “Kubernetes” where a screener will see it: missing on 5 of the 7.
In the interview
New · BetaLive cues on your phone while you talk: the question, how to answer it, and what a full answer still needs. It already knows the job, the recruiter’s brief and your resume.
See the co-pilot →Tell me about something you built
How to answer
Headline first, then the old way
After every round
The likely result a minute after you hang up, the stronger answer to each question, and a plan for the next round.
Change next time: two numbers first, then the diagram.
The live interview co-pilot
Most interview tools stop at practice questions. This one sits in the real interview, and because it is part of your search, it already knows the job, the recruiter’s brief and your resume.
Before
Forward the recruiter’s email and it follows their plan, minute by minute. Paste the written exercise and every hint uses it.
Got the recruiter’s brief from Dana at Northwind
During
Each question as it is asked, how to answer it, and one cue at a time while you talk.
Next
Wrap up high-level design, move on
Say: “That covers the write path. Shall I go deeper on storage?”
After
About a minute after you end: the likely result, the stronger answer to each question, and what to drill next.
One screen that follows the conversation. Short cues, eight words or fewer, so you can read them in a glance and keep your eyes on the call.
The card follows the conversation. A follow-up branches off the main problem, and the parts a full answer needs tick off as you cover them.
Design an urgent-finding alert system for lung CT
↳How do you know the scan series has ended?
To cover: 3 of 6 done
Six steps for system design, five for coding, STAR for a story, a walk-through for something you built. Worked out per question, with no picker.
Chapter 5 of 6
3 doneEstimates you say out loud become a board you can point back to, with the sum behind each one.
Your numbers
≈600K scans/day15K scanners × ~40
≈300 TB/day600K × 500 MB
6M inferences/day600K × 10
Ask them: GPU time per algorithm?
It knows what a complete design covers, so it names the part you have not reached yet and splits the time left.
Still to cover
Not covered yet: the database
If the interviewer corrects you, a calm line to say comes up, in the language of the interview.
Fix this now
Re-check the storage estimate
Help me with this gives the next step. Answer rescue builds an outline from your own profile and prep.
Help
Restate the question, then plan
When the interviewer says how long you have, it counts down and tells you when a part runs over.
Time
Past the 10 min for the exercise
Talking too fast, running long, repeating yourself, filling pauses. One nudge at a time, then it gets out of the way.
Running long
Land it in one sentence
Nice
Strong answer. 3 in a row
A salary range from the target on your profile, and the questions worth asking back before time runs out.
Salary
Give a range, not a number
Next
Ask your questions now
It picks up the language of the interview on its own, and every cue and chapter comes in it. Hebrew cues never guess your gender.
Save
לנשום. לקנות רגע
Next
לסגור חזק
Screens shown with sample data.
Share your whole screen if they ask. The cues are on your phone, not on the screen they see.
Every cue is on a screen. No voice, no audio, nothing played into the call.
No bot in the meeting and no plugin for Zoom or Meet. It hears through your phone on the desk, or the sound of your call tab. The picture is never read.
On a computer it only listens. The cues go to your phone, paired with one code, so there is nothing of the co-pilot on your screen to share, whatever you share.
A locked phone stops its microphone, so the screen stays on until you end.
Some companies do not allow AI help. Before it listens, you confirm listening is allowed for this round. The audio stays with the round so you can play it back, and you can delete it there.
Sharing your screen
Paired with your computer
Tell me about something you built
Walk them through it
Still to say: the result
The whole screen is shared, and there is no cue on it. They are on the phone beside you.
The likely result, what went well, the stronger answer to each question and a plan for the next round. It lands in Coach beside every other interview, so patterns across rounds show up too.
My read of the result
Likely moving onYou set the requirements and the numbers before drawing, and they followed your design.
What decided it: the requirements came first and every estimate had a sum behind it.
A read of the transcript, not the company’s decision.
Change next time
You drew boxes before the scale.
Instead: two numbers first, then the diagram.
Keep doing
Saying the trade-off out loud before choosing.
Your training plan
Shown with sample data.
The rest of your search
Everything here reads your own board: not a model's impression of the job market, but counts over the applications you actually sent.
Where your applications actually die
7 of 11 closed at “Getting a reply”.
A loss here is about the resume, or the roles you pick. Nobody spoke to you.
Do next
Put evidence for “Kubernetes” where a screener will see it
an unevidenced critical requirement on 5 of the 7 that never replied
Meta · Ramp · Wiz · AWS · Snyk
Fix one thing on the resume itself
“Two-column layout may not parse” was flagged on 8 of the 12 scored
Send fewer of the roles a rung over yours
1 of 5 replied, against 8 of 11 at your level
Pick a phase. Every line is a count over the applications above it, so anything here can be checked against the board.
Seven rejections is a pattern. One is noise. Ask in plain language and it reads every job description on your board against your resume at once, then names the thing they had in common.
Every line carries the number it rests on, and where the count is too small to mean anything, it says so instead of answering.
Why did I get those seven rejections, and how do I fix it?
All seven closed at “Getting a reply”.
A loss here is about the resume, or the roles you pick. Nobody spoke to you.
Put evidence for “Kubernetes” where a screener will see it
an unevidenced critical requirement on 5 of the 7 that never replied
Meta · Ramp · Wiz · AWS · Snyk
Nothing on offer negotiation yet. You have had 0 offers, and one would not be a pattern.
Forward the email and the row files itself: company, role, stage, the contact who wrote to you. You are not maintaining this.
And because it is kept for you rather than by you, it sees the thing a spreadsheet structurally cannot: nothing happening. Silence never gets typed into a cell. Here it surfaces on its own.
Today
Fireblocks · VP Engineering
filed itself 4 minutes ago
Anthropic · Eng Manager
asked for your availability
Ramp · Staff Engineer
nothing has happened since 19 Aug
Every status change is an event, not an overwrite, which is what makes the third row possible at all.
Not a filter over a job board. Describe the search the way you would to a friend, including what the move is for, and it goes looking, then argues both sides of every company it brings back.
It re-checks every week for free, and nothing it finds reaches your board unless you put it there.
What are you looking for this time?
“VP or Director of Engineering at a 100–400 person company in Tel Aviv. Platform or payments. I want to stay five years this time.”
Fireblocks
280 peopleThe case for
“scaling the platform group through 2027” (their careers page, this week)
The case against
Two VPs in four years. Against a goal of staying five, that is the risk.
A company with nothing open at your level is listed as exactly that, never fitted with a role it does not have.
An interview is the one part you cannot practise alone, and the one you walk out of sure it went fine. The recording says otherwise, in numbers: how much of the hour you took, how long your longest answer ran, how often you filled a pause, how many questions you asked back.
Then it holds those against your own rounds that advanced, so “you talk too much” becomes 71% against the 54% that got you through, which is a thing you can practise.
Snyk · round 2 of 4
Your other three rounds averaged 54%. The two that advanced were both under 60.
The six-minute answer landed on “tell me about the migration”. Worth rehearsing a two-minute version of that one.
Audio deleted after reading. The transcript and these numbers stay.
Screens shown with sample data.
Forward a real recruiter email, not a clean sample. Watch which words each field on the board was read from.
What lands in your inbox
Next steps for your application
Hi Eran, thanks for applying to the VP Engineering role. We'd love to set up a 45-minute intro call with Dana next week. Are you free Tuesday or Thursday morning?
Forwarded to you-a7f2@in.landmode.app
What's on your board
Fireblocks
Read straight off the email, and the resume is the one already on this application. Open the row and each field shows the line it came from.
You are the product, the salesperson and the only person on your side. You send the application, you wait, and when nothing comes back nobody tells you which of the forty was the mistake.
Forty sent. Nine replies. No pattern you can see from the inside.
An hour on the call, and nobody to tell you what that follow-up was really asking.
Two offers on a Thursday, and a decision made on a feeling.
From here you are not doing it alone. Not because something is cheering for you. Because something is finally keeping score beside you, and in the room with you, and will tell you the truth about what it sees, including the parts you would rather it did not.
There is not an honest one to show yet. Here are four things you can check instead.
You get a private forwarding address. LandMode never asks for access to your mailbox and could not read it if it wanted to: the sign-in scopes are openid, email and profile.
Open any application it filled in and each value carries the line of the email or posting it was read from. Nothing is asserted without the evidence attached.
Paste a search results page and it refuses to invent a role, then offers the real ones it found. A company with nothing open at your level is listed as exactly that.
It drafts follow-ups, cover letters and tailored bullets. You send them. No auto-apply, no messages to a recruiter you did not write.
Every other tracker models one job hunt and throws it away the moment you accept. Here a search is a period with its own goals, its own results and its own ending, so three years later you can still answer why you moved.
And the numbers span them. Your response rate this time against the last time, what you said you wanted then, and whether you actually got it.
One tension
You want the biggest offer you can get and somewhere you can stay five years, at a 100–400 person company. Those trade against each other: the places paying top of band for a VP are the ones with the most pressure on a two-year horizon. Which gives, if one has to?
First VP role
Wanted scope and got it. The resume you actually sent is still attached to every application, seven years later.
Out of consulting
Recorded from memory, after the fact. No candidates, no AI, and it still counts toward your numbers.
Back to platform, bigger scope
Goals written down, so a company that pays more but breaks one of them ranks lower, and says which one.
Every plan has the live co-pilot. Free comes with 30 interview minutes a month, enough for one short screen or a practice round, and 30 AI runs for reading your resume, running one real search and working five applications properly. You will know whether this helps before anyone asks you for a card.
Free
$0
30 interview minutes, live or recorded
50 active applications
30 AI runs a month
1 saved search
50 forwarded emails a month
100 assistant messages
1 resume
Metrics, coach and fit, all of it
Pro
For a real search$9.99 / month
300 interview minutes, live or recorded
Unlimited active applications
500 AI runs a month
Unlimited saved searches
500 forwarded emails a month
1,000 assistant messages
Unlimited resumes
Metrics, coach and fit, all of it
Max
$29.99 / month
1,200 interview minutes, live or recorded
Unlimited active applications
2,000 AI runs a month
Unlimited saved searches
2,000 forwarded emails a month
5,000 assistant messages
Unlimited resumes
Metrics, coach and fit, all of it
For an all-out search
Interview minutes cover the live co-pilot and uploaded recordings together. Importing your spreadsheet is free on every plan. Tailored variants do not count against the resume limit, and neither cache hits nor failed runs consume an AI run.
No. It never makes a sound and nothing joins the call. With a phone on the desk, the phone is its screen. On a computer it only listens, and the cues show on your phone, so sharing your screen shows none of them.
That is up to the company, so check the invite: some do not allow AI help in interviews. It also hears the interviewer, so before it starts you confirm listening is allowed for that round. The audio stays with the round so you can play it back, and you can delete it there.
With a phone on the desk, anything you can put on speaker: Zoom, Meet, Teams. On a computer the call has to be in a browser tab, because it listens to that tab’s sound. It follows English and Hebrew and picks the language up on its own. It does not do rounds in person.
No, and you cannot. LandMode requests only the openid, email and profile scopes when you sign in. It has no Gmail permission of any kind. Tracking works by forwarding: you get a private address and send it whatever you want filed. Forwarding is the permission, one message at a time.
You correct it, and nothing was saved as fact before you did. Every parsed field is editable and marked as read, inferred or flagged, so you can see what the machine decided about you before agreeing to it.
Yes, and it does not depend on them. Postings from the major applicant tracking systems are read directly, and anything else arrives the same way every confirmation email does: by forward.
No. Auto-apply is a deliberate non-goal. A bad application sent under your name without your review is worse than the time it saves, so drafting is in scope and sending never is.
No. Paste it into the importer and it maps your columns, previews the result, and saves nothing until you have checked it. Importing is free on every plan.
It reads it once and lets you argue with every field before anything is saved. When the first round comes, take a practice one with the co-pilot first, so the real one is not the first time you hear it.
Start freeNothing is auto-applied. Nothing is ever sent for you.